Defamation and Layoffs: What Happens When Employers Tarnish Your Reputation?

Recently, Meta announced that it would be cutting ties with "low performers," a statement that was closely followed by a 5% reduction in its workforce. For many former employees, the implication was clear: If you were let go, you must have been underperforming. However, some of those affected are pushing back, claiming they were not low performers and that Meta’s framing of the layoffs has harmed their professional reputations.

This situation raises a critical question in employment law: When does an employer’s characterization of an employee’s termination cross the line into defamation?

Understanding Defamation in the Workplace

Defamation occurs when someone makes a false statement about another person that damages their reputation. In California, defamation can take two forms:

• Libel: Written or printed false statements (including emails, internal memos, or public statements).
• Slander: Spoken false statements.

To establish a defamation claim, a former employee must generally show:

1. A False Statement – The employer made a factually incorrect statement about the employee.
2. Publication – The statement was communicated to others.
3. Harm to Reputation – The statement negatively impacted the employee’s career or standing.
4. Negligence or Malice – The employer either failed to verify the truth of the statement or knowingly made a false statement.

When Layoff Announcements Go Too Far

Employers have the right to downsize, but they must be careful about how they frame layoffs. If Meta—or any other company—publicly states that terminations were based on performance, yet some of those affected had no history of poor reviews or performance issues, those employees might have a claim for defamation.

For example:

• If an employer broadly categorizes layoffs as targeting "low performers" but includes employees with strong performance records, those employees could argue that the statement is false and damaging.
• If a manager tells colleagues, recruiters, or industry peers that a terminated employee was a poor performer when that’s not true, this could constitute defamation.
• If a manager falsely claims that the employee was terminated for violating company policy when no such violation occurred, this could also be considered defamation.
• If the company makes internal statements that affect an employee’s future job prospects, those statements might also be actionable if they are not accurate.

The Real-World Consequences of Workplace Defamation

Being labeled a “low performer” can have serious career consequences. In industries like tech, where networking and reputation are key, a false implication of underperformance can cost someone future job opportunities. Recruiters and hiring managers may hesitate to hire someone who was publicly linked to performance-based terminations.

Damages May Be Presumed: Defamation Per Se in Employment Cases

In California, defamation per se applies when false statements directly harm a person's professional reputation. If an employer falsely claims an employee was a poor performer or engaged in misconduct, the law may presume damages without requiring proof of actual harm. This is especially important in cases where someone may not have yet experienced damages or where damages may be difficult to prove, as companies will often not provide a reason for deciding not to hire someone.

What Can Employees Do?

If you suspect that your former employer has defamed you, consider the following steps:
​

1. Document Everything – Keep records of any statements made about your termination, including emails, performance reviews, and internal communications.
2. Request Corrections – In some cases, a demand letter requesting a correction can resolve the issue before litigation.
3. Seek Legal Advice – Consulting with an employment attorney can help determine whether you have a viable defamation claim and what legal remedies are available.

Final Thoughts

Layoffs are difficult enough without the added harm of a tarnished reputation. Employers should be mindful of how they communicate reductions in force, ensuring they do not misrepresent an employee’s performance. Employees who find themselves unfairly labeled have legal options to restore their professional standing.
​
If you believe you have been defamed by your former employer, consider speaking with an attorney to explore your rights. In California, the law protects employees from reputational harm caused by false and damaging statements, and you may be entitled to legal recourse.